Comparison
Pit two athletes against each other, sector by sector, hundredth by hundredth.
VS
Warholm wins by 1.59s
Total time
48.10s46.51s
+1.59s
Average interval
4.08s3.97s
+0.11s
Std. deviation
0.410.36
+0.05
Fastest split
3.62s3.52s
+0.10s
Deceleration
12.4%10.8%
+1.60
A. SAMBA
48.10sK. WARHOLM
46.51s
48.10sK. WARHOLM46.51s| Sectors | Splits | Cumulative | Strides | Lead leg | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | Diff. | A | B | Diff. | |||
| Start | 5.88 | 5.68 | +0.20 | 5.88 | 5.68 | +0.20 | 21/20 | R/L |
| H2 | 3.62 | 3.52 | +0.10 | 9.50 | 9.20 | +0.30 | 13/13 | R/L |
| H3 | 3.65 | 3.56 | +0.09 | 13.15 | 12.76 | +0.39 | 13/13 | R/L |
| H4 | 3.70 | 3.68 | +0.02 | 16.85 | 16.44 | +0.41 | 13/13 | R/L |
| H5 | 3.82 | 3.76 | +0.06 | 20.67 | 20.20 | +0.47 | 13/13 | R/L |
| H6 | 4.05 | 3.92 | +0.13 | 24.72 | 24.12 | +0.60 | 13/13 | R/L |
| H7 | 4.13 | 4.08 | +0.05 | 28.85 | 28.20 | +0.65 | 13/13 | R/L |
| H8 | 4.33 | 4.20 | +0.13 | 33.18 | 32.40 | +0.78 | 13/13 | R/L |
| H9 | 4.57 | 4.40 | +0.17 | 37.75 | 36.80 | +0.95 | 14/13 | L/L |
| H10 | 4.83 | 4.61 | +0.22 | 42.58 | 41.41 | +1.17 | 14/15 | R/L |
| Finish sprint | 5.52 | 5.10 | +0.42 | 48.10 | 46.51 | +1.59 | Σ 140/Σ 139 | —/— |
Duel replay
0.00s
- A. Samba48.10sleading
- K. Warholm46.51sleading
Starting positions and hurldes are aligned to better show the gaps between runners.
Stride pattern
Stride count and lead leg, hurdle by hurdle
Samba (2026)Warholm (2023)
The turning point
One leader, wire to wire
A. SAMBA48.10sK. WARHOLM46.51s
48.10sK. WARHOLM46.51sK. WARHOLMH1 → Finish sprint
Head-to-head record
1Samba
–2Warholm
over 3 meetings