Comparison
Pit two athletes against each other, sector by sector, hundredth by hundredth.
VS
Samba wins by 1.20s
Total time
48.18s46.98s
+1.20s
Average interval
4.11s4.00s
+0.11s
Std. deviation
0.330.32
+0.01
Fastest split
3.67s3.64s
+0.03s
Deceleration
8.5%8.8%
-0.30
E. AGYEKUM
48.18sA. SAMBA
46.98s
48.18sA. SAMBA46.98s| Sectors | Splits | Cumulative | Strides | Lead leg | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | Diff. | A | B | Diff. | |||
| Start | 6.06 | 5.90 | +0.16 | 6.06 | 5.90 | +0.16 | 20/21 | L/R |
| H2 | 3.87 | 3.64 | +0.23 | 9.93 | 9.54 | +0.39 | 13/13 | L/R |
| H3 | 3.73 | 3.64 | +0.09 | 13.66 | 13.18 | +0.48 | 13/13 | L/R |
| H4 | 3.67 | 3.68 | -0.01 | 17.33 | 16.86 | +0.47 | 13/13 | L/R |
| H5 | 3.90 | 3.80 | +0.10 | 21.23 | 20.66 | +0.57 | 13/13 | L/R |
| H6 | 4.00 | 3.92 | +0.08 | 25.23 | 24.58 | +0.65 | 13/13 | L/R |
| H7 | 4.23 | 4.12 | +0.11 | 29.46 | 28.70 | +0.76 | 13/13 | L/R |
| H8 | 4.42 | 4.24 | +0.18 | 33.88 | 32.94 | +0.94 | 14/14 | R/L |
| H9 | 4.55 | 4.44 | +0.11 | 38.43 | 37.38 | +1.05 | 14/14 | L/R |
| H10 | 4.60 | 4.48 | +0.12 | 43.03 | 41.86 | +1.17 | 14/14 | R/L |
| Finish sprint | 5.15 | 5.12 | +0.03 | 48.18 | 46.98 | +1.20 | Σ 140/Σ 141 | —/— |
Duel replay
0.00s
- E. Agyekum48.18sleading
- A. Samba46.98sleading
Starting positions and hurldes are aligned to better show the gaps between runners.
Stride pattern
Stride count and lead leg, hurdle by hurdle
Agyekum (2026)Samba (2018)
The turning point
One leader, wire to wire
E. AGYEKUM48.18sA. SAMBA46.98s
48.18sA. SAMBA46.98sA. SAMBAH1 → Finish sprint
Head-to-head record
2Agyekum
–0Samba
over 2 meetings