Comparison
Pit two athletes against each other, sector by sector, hundredth by hundredth.
VS
Nathaniel wins by 1.08s
Total time
48.30s49.38s
-1.08s
Average interval
4.08s4.21s
-0.13s
Std. deviation
0.400.36
+0.04
Fastest split
3.60s3.80s
-0.20s
Deceleration
11.9%9.3%
+2.60
E. NATHANIEL
48.30sD. NUGENT
49.38s
48.30sD. NUGENT49.38s| Sectors | Splits | Cumulative | Strides | Lead leg | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | Diff. | A | B | Diff. | |||
| Start | 6.03 | 6.21 | -0.18 | 6.03 | 6.21 | -0.18 | 21/— | R/R |
| H2 | 3.60 | 3.80 | -0.20 | 9.63 | 10.01 | -0.38 | 13/14 | R/L |
| H3 | 3.60 | 3.80 | -0.20 | 13.23 | 13.81 | -0.58 | 13/13 | R/L |
| H4 | 3.72 | 3.87 | -0.15 | 16.95 | 17.68 | -0.73 | 13/13 | R/L |
| H5 | 3.88 | 3.97 | -0.09 | 20.83 | 21.65 | -0.82 | 13/13 | R/L |
| H6 | 4.07 | 4.17 | -0.10 | 24.90 | 25.82 | -0.92 | 13/14 | R/R |
| H7 | 4.18 | 4.30 | -0.12 | 29.08 | 30.12 | -1.04 | 13/14 | R/L |
| H8 | 4.35 | 4.47 | -0.12 | 33.43 | 34.59 | -1.16 | 13/15 | R/L |
| H9 | 4.68 | 4.70 | -0.02 | 38.11 | 39.29 | -1.18 | 14/15 | L/L |
| H10 | 4.68 | 4.77 | -0.09 | 42.79 | 44.06 | -1.27 | 14/15 | R/L |
| Finish sprint | 5.51 | 5.32 | +0.19 | 48.30 | 49.38 | -1.08 | Σ 140/Σ 126 | —/— |
Duel replay
0.00s
- E. Nathaniel48.30sleading
- D. Nugent49.38sleading
Starting positions and hurldes are aligned to better show the gaps between runners.
Stride pattern
Stride count and lead leg, hurdle by hurdle
Nathaniel (2026)Nugent (2026)
The turning point
One leader, wire to wire
E. NATHANIEL48.30sD. NUGENT49.38s
48.30sD. NUGENT49.38sE. NATHANIELH1 → Finish sprint