Comparison
Pit two athletes against each other, sector by sector, hundredth by hundredth.
VS
Langford wins by 2.49s
Total time
52.89s50.40s
+2.49s
Average interval
4.44s4.30s
+0.14s
Std. deviation
0.260.27
-0.01
Fastest split
4.08s3.87s
+0.21s
Deceleration
8.8%7.7%
+1.10
M. BERTIL
52.89sN. LANGFORD
50.40s
52.89sN. LANGFORD50.40s| Sectors | Splits | Cumulative | Strides | Lead leg | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | Diff. | A | B | Diff. | |||
| Start | 6.50 | 6.17 | +0.33 | 6.50 | 6.17 | +0.33 | 21/20 | R/R |
| H2 | 4.08 | 3.87 | +0.21 | 10.58 | 10.04 | +0.54 | 14/13 | L/R |
| H3 | 4.24 | 4.07 | +0.17 | 14.82 | 14.11 | +0.71 | 14/13 | R/R |
| H4 | 4.16 | 4.07 | +0.09 | 18.98 | 18.18 | +0.80 | 14/13 | L/R |
| H5 | 4.28 | 4.13 | +0.15 | 23.26 | 22.31 | +0.95 | 14/13 | R/R |
| H6 | 4.36 | 4.23 | +0.13 | 27.62 | 26.54 | +1.08 | 14/13 | L/R |
| H7 | 4.64 | 4.47 | +0.17 | 32.26 | 31.01 | +1.25 | 15/15 | L/R |
| H8 | 4.80 | 4.57 | +0.23 | 37.06 | 35.58 | +1.48 | 15/15 | L/R |
| H9 | 4.76 | 4.60 | +0.16 | 41.82 | 40.18 | +1.64 | 15/15 | L/R |
| H10 | 4.68 | 4.67 | +0.01 | 46.50 | 44.85 | +1.65 | 15/15 | L/R |
| Finish sprint | 6.39 | 5.55 | +0.84 | 52.89 | 50.40 | +2.49 | Σ 151/Σ 145 | —/— |
Duel replay
0.00s
- M. Bertil52.89sleading
- N. Langford50.40sleading
Starting positions and hurldes are aligned to better show the gaps between runners.
Stride pattern
Stride count and lead leg, hurdle by hurdle
Bertil (2017)Langford (2026)
The turning point
One leader, wire to wire
M. BERTIL52.89sN. LANGFORD50.40s
52.89sN. LANGFORD50.40sN. LANGFORDH1 → Finish sprint