Comparison
Pit two athletes against each other, sector by sector, hundredth by hundredth.
VS
Celms wins by 0.94s
Total time
52.41s51.47s
+0.94s
Average interval
4.54s4.43s
+0.11s
Std. deviation
0.230.32
-0.09
Fastest split
4.08s3.88s
+0.20s
Deceleration
5.1%8.7%
-3.60
J. SAUVAGET
52.41sM. CELMS
51.47s
52.41sM. CELMS51.47s| Sectors | Splits | Cumulative | Strides | Lead leg | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | Diff. | A | B | Diff. | |||
| Start | 6.28 | 6.25 | +0.03 | 6.28 | 6.25 | +0.03 | 21/21 | L/L |
| H2 | 4.08 | 3.88 | +0.20 | 10.36 | 10.13 | +0.23 | 14/13 | R/L |
| H3 | 4.32 | 4.04 | +0.28 | 14.68 | 14.17 | +0.51 | 14/13 | L/L |
| H4 | 4.36 | 4.16 | +0.20 | 19.04 | 18.33 | +0.71 | 14/13 | R/L |
| H5 | 4.52 | 4.32 | +0.20 | 23.56 | 22.65 | +0.91 | 14/14 | L/R |
| H6 | 4.56 | 4.52 | +0.04 | 28.12 | 27.17 | +0.95 | 14/14 | R/L |
| H7 | 4.68 | 4.68 | 0.00 | 32.80 | 31.85 | +0.95 | 15/15 | R/L |
| H8 | 4.80 | 4.72 | +0.08 | 37.60 | 36.57 | +1.03 | 15/15 | R/L |
| H9 | 4.76 | 4.72 | +0.04 | 42.36 | 41.29 | +1.07 | 15/15 | R/L |
| H10 | 4.76 | 4.80 | -0.04 | 47.12 | 46.09 | +1.03 | 15/15 | R/L |
| Finish sprint | 5.29 | 5.38 | -0.09 | 52.41 | 51.47 | +0.94 | Σ 151/Σ 148 | —/— |
Duel replay
0.00s
- J. Sauvaget52.41sleading
- M. Celms51.47sleading
Starting positions and hurldes are aligned to better show the gaps between runners.
Stride pattern
Stride count and lead leg, hurdle by hurdle
Sauvaget (2026)Celms (2026)
The turning point
One leader, wire to wire
J. SAUVAGET52.41sM. CELMS51.47s
52.41sM. CELMS51.47sM. CELMSH1 → Finish sprint
Head-to-head record
0Sauvaget
–1Celms
over 1 meeting