Comparison
Pit two athletes against each other, sector by sector, hundredth by hundredth.
VS
Samba wins by 0.20s
Total time
48.30s48.10s
+0.20s
Average interval
4.08s4.08s
0.00s
Std. deviation
0.400.41
-0.01
Fastest split
3.60s3.62s
-0.02s
Deceleration
11.9%12.4%
-0.50
E. NATHANIEL
48.30sA. SAMBA
48.10s
48.30sA. SAMBA48.10s| Sectors | Splits | Cumulative | Strides | Lead leg | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | Diff. | A | B | Diff. | |||
| Start | 6.03 | 5.88 | +0.15 | 6.03 | 5.88 | +0.15 | 21/21 | R/R |
| H2 | 3.60 | 3.62 | -0.02 | 9.63 | 9.50 | +0.13 | 13/13 | R/R |
| H3 | 3.60 | 3.65 | -0.05 | 13.23 | 13.15 | +0.08 | 13/13 | R/R |
| H4 | 3.72 | 3.70 | +0.02 | 16.95 | 16.85 | +0.10 | 13/13 | R/R |
| H5 | 3.88 | 3.82 | +0.06 | 20.83 | 20.67 | +0.16 | 13/13 | R/R |
| H6 | 4.07 | 4.05 | +0.02 | 24.90 | 24.72 | +0.18 | 13/13 | R/R |
| H7 | 4.18 | 4.13 | +0.05 | 29.08 | 28.85 | +0.23 | 13/13 | R/R |
| H8 | 4.35 | 4.33 | +0.02 | 33.43 | 33.18 | +0.25 | 13/13 | R/R |
| H9 | 4.68 | 4.57 | +0.11 | 38.11 | 37.75 | +0.36 | 14/14 | L/L |
| H10 | 4.68 | 4.83 | -0.15 | 42.79 | 42.58 | +0.21 | 14/14 | R/R |
| Finish sprint | 5.51 | 5.52 | -0.01 | 48.30 | 48.10 | +0.20 | Σ 140/Σ 140 | —/— |
Duel replay
0.00s
- E. Nathaniel48.30sleading
- A. Samba48.10sleading
Starting positions and hurldes are aligned to better show the gaps between runners.
Stride pattern
Stride count and lead leg, hurdle by hurdle
Nathaniel (2026)Samba (2026)
The turning point
One leader, wire to wire
E. NATHANIEL48.30sA. SAMBA48.10s
48.30sA. SAMBA48.10sA. SAMBAH1 → Finish sprint
Head-to-head record
0Nathaniel
–3Samba
over 3 meetings