Comparison
Pit two athletes against each other, sector by sector, hundredth by hundredth.
VS
Nathaniel wins by 2.15s
Total time
48.30s50.45s
-2.15s
Average interval
4.08s4.16s
-0.08s
Std. deviation
0.400.42
-0.02
Fastest split
3.60s3.65s
-0.05s
Deceleration
11.9%16.8%
-4.90
E. NATHANIEL
48.30sC. DEAN
50.45s
48.30sC. DEAN50.45s| Sectors | Splits | Cumulative | Strides | Lead leg | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | Diff. | A | B | Diff. | |||
| Start | 6.03 | 5.94 | +0.09 | 6.03 | 5.94 | +0.09 | 21/21 | R/R |
| H2 | 3.60 | 3.80 | -0.20 | 9.63 | 9.74 | -0.11 | 13/14 | R/L |
| H3 | 3.60 | 3.83 | -0.23 | 13.23 | 13.57 | -0.34 | 13/14 | R/R |
| H4 | 3.72 | 3.65 | +0.07 | 16.95 | 17.22 | -0.27 | 13/13 | R/R |
| H5 | 3.88 | 3.83 | +0.05 | 20.83 | 21.05 | -0.22 | 13/13 | R/R |
| H6 | 4.07 | 4.05 | +0.02 | 24.90 | 25.10 | -0.20 | 13/13 | R/R |
| H7 | 4.18 | 4.17 | +0.01 | 29.08 | 29.27 | -0.19 | 13/13 | R/R |
| H8 | 4.35 | 4.47 | -0.12 | 33.43 | 33.74 | -0.31 | 13/14 | R/L |
| H9 | 4.68 | 4.77 | -0.09 | 38.11 | 38.51 | -0.40 | 14/15 | L/L |
| H10 | 4.68 | 4.85 | -0.17 | 42.79 | 43.36 | -0.57 | 14/16 | R/R |
| Finish sprint | 5.51 | 7.09 | -1.58 | 48.30 | 50.45 | -2.15 | Σ 140/Σ 146 | —/— |
Duel replay
0.00s
- E. Nathaniel48.30sleading
- C. Dean50.45sleading
Starting positions and hurldes are aligned to better show the gaps between runners.
Stride pattern
Stride count and lead leg, hurdle by hurdle
Nathaniel (2026)Dean (2026)
The turning point
1 lead change
E. NATHANIEL48.30sC. DEAN50.45s
48.30sC. DEAN50.45sC. DEANH1
E. NATHANIELH2 → Finish sprint
Head-to-head record
1Nathaniel
–1Dean
over 2 meetings