Comparison
Pit two athletes against each other, sector by sector, hundredth by hundredth.
VS
Lima wins by 0.19s
Total time
48.37s48.18s
+0.19s
Average interval
4.13s4.11s
+0.02s
Std. deviation
0.390.35
+0.04
Fastest split
3.67s3.68s
-0.01s
Deceleration
11.1%10.7%
+0.40
E. NATHANIEL
48.37sM. LIMA
48.18s
48.37sM. LIMA48.18s| Sectors | Splits | Cumulative | Strides | Lead leg | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | Diff. | A | B | Diff. | |||
| Start | 5.92 | 5.89 | +0.03 | 5.92 | 5.89 | +0.03 | 20/21 | R/L |
| H2 | 3.74 | 3.80 | -0.06 | 9.66 | 9.69 | -0.03 | 13/13 | R/L |
| H3 | 3.73 | 3.68 | +0.05 | 13.39 | 13.37 | +0.02 | 13/13 | R/L |
| H4 | 3.67 | 3.69 | -0.02 | 17.06 | 17.06 | 0.00 | 13/13 | R/L |
| H5 | 3.90 | 3.87 | +0.03 | 20.96 | 20.93 | +0.03 | 13/13 | R/L |
| H6 | 4.10 | 4.10 | 0.00 | 25.06 | 25.03 | +0.03 | 13/13 | R/L |
| H7 | 4.23 | 4.30 | -0.07 | 29.29 | 29.33 | -0.04 | 13/14 | R/R |
| H8 | 4.30 | 4.40 | -0.10 | 33.59 | 33.73 | -0.14 | 13/14 | R/L |
| H9 | 4.70 | 4.53 | +0.17 | 38.29 | 38.26 | +0.03 | 14/14 | L/R |
| H10 | 4.77 | 4.63 | +0.14 | 43.06 | 42.89 | +0.17 | 14/14 | R/L |
| Finish sprint | 5.31 | 5.29 | +0.02 | 48.37 | 48.18 | +0.19 | Σ 139/Σ 142 | —/— |
Duel replay
0.00s
- E. Nathaniel48.37sleading
- M. Lima48.18sleading
Starting positions and hurldes are aligned to better show the gaps between runners.
Stride pattern
Stride count and lead leg, hurdle by hurdle
Nathaniel (2026)Lima (2026)
The turning point
4 lead changes
E. NATHANIEL48.37sM. LIMA48.18s
48.37sM. LIMA48.18sM. LIMAH1
E. NATHANIELH2
M. LIMAH3 → H6
E. NATHANIELH7 → H8
M. LIMAH9 → Finish sprint
Head-to-head record
1Nathaniel
–2Lima
over 3 meetings