Comparison
Pit two athletes against each other, sector by sector, hundredth by hundredth.
VS
Cusbeross wins by 3.38s
Total time
51.31s47.93s
+3.38s
Average interval
4.40s4.10s
+0.30s
Std. deviation
0.330.33
0.00
Fastest split
3.88s3.61s
+0.27s
Deceleration
8.9%9.5%
-0.60
M. SEGHAIER
51.31sO. CUSBEROSS
47.93s
51.31sO. CUSBEROSS47.93s| Sectors | Splits | Cumulative | Strides | Lead leg | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | Diff. | A | B | Diff. | |||
| Start | 6.26 | 5.92 | +0.34 | 6.26 | 5.92 | +0.34 | 21/21 | L/L |
| H2 | 3.88 | 3.61 | +0.27 | 10.14 | 9.53 | +0.61 | 13/13 | L/L |
| H3 | 4.00 | 3.71 | +0.29 | 14.14 | 13.24 | +0.90 | 14/13 | R/L |
| H4 | 4.20 | 3.84 | +0.36 | 18.34 | 17.08 | +1.26 | 14/13 | L/L |
| H5 | 4.20 | 3.91 | +0.29 | 22.54 | 20.99 | +1.55 | 13/13 | L/L |
| H6 | 4.40 | 4.14 | +0.26 | 26.94 | 25.13 | +1.81 | 14/13 | R/L |
| H7 | 4.52 | 4.27 | +0.25 | 31.46 | 29.40 | +2.06 | 14/14 | L/R |
| H8 | 4.68 | 4.33 | +0.35 | 36.14 | 33.73 | +2.41 | 15/14 | L/L |
| H9 | 4.76 | 4.47 | +0.29 | 40.90 | 38.20 | +2.70 | 15/14 | L/R |
| H10 | 4.92 | 4.60 | +0.32 | 45.82 | 42.80 | +3.02 | 15/14 | L/L |
| Finish sprint | 5.49 | 5.13 | +0.36 | 51.31 | 47.93 | +3.38 | Σ 148/Σ 142 | —/— |
Duel replay
0.00s
- M. Seghaier51.31sleading
- O. Cusbeross47.93sleading
Starting positions and hurldes are aligned to better show the gaps between runners.
Stride pattern
Stride count and lead leg, hurdle by hurdle
Seghaier (2017)Cusbeross (2013)
The turning point
One leader, wire to wire
M. SEGHAIER51.31sO. CUSBEROSS47.93s
51.31sO. CUSBEROSS47.93sO. CUSBEROSSH1 → Finish sprint