Comparison
Pit two athletes against each other, sector by sector, hundredth by hundredth.
VS
Carli wins by 3.40s
Total time
55.85s59.25s
-3.40s
Average interval
4.81s5.06s
-0.25s
Std. deviation
0.430.46
-0.03
Fastest split
4.13s4.42s
-0.29s
Deceleration
12.1%13.8%
-1.70
S. CARLI
55.85sR. DANNENBURG
59.25s
55.85sR. DANNENBURG59.25s| Sectors | Splits | Cumulative | Strides | Lead leg | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | Diff. | A | B | Diff. | |||
| Start | 6.49 | 6.87 | -0.38 | 6.49 | 6.87 | -0.38 | 23/23 | L/R |
| H2 | 4.13 | 4.42 | -0.29 | 10.62 | 11.29 | -0.67 | 15/16 | L/L |
| H3 | 4.33 | 4.58 | -0.25 | 14.95 | 15.87 | -0.92 | 15/16 | L/R |
| H4 | 4.47 | 4.62 | -0.15 | 19.42 | 20.49 | -1.07 | 15/16 | L/L |
| H5 | 4.63 | 4.74 | -0.11 | 24.05 | 25.23 | -1.18 | 16/16 | R/R |
| H6 | 4.77 | 5.04 | -0.27 | 28.82 | 30.27 | -1.45 | 16/16 | L/L |
| H7 | 5.07 | 5.40 | -0.33 | 33.89 | 35.67 | -1.78 | 16/17 | R/L |
| H8 | 5.43 | 5.62 | -0.19 | 39.32 | 41.29 | -1.97 | 18/18 | L/R |
| H9 | 5.27 | 5.54 | -0.27 | 44.59 | 46.83 | -2.24 | 17/17 | L/R |
| H10 | 5.23 | 5.58 | -0.35 | 49.82 | 52.41 | -2.59 | 17/17 | L/R |
| Finish sprint | 6.03 | 6.84 | -0.81 | 55.85 | 59.25 | -3.40 | Σ 168/Σ 172 | —/— |
Duel replay
0.00s
- S. Carli55.85sleading
- R. Dannenburg59.25sleading
Starting positions and hurldes are aligned to better show the gaps between runners.
Stride pattern
Stride count and lead leg, hurdle by hurdle
Carli (2026)Dannenburg (2026)
The turning point
One leader, wire to wire
S. CARLI55.85sR. DANNENBURG59.25s
55.85sR. DANNENBURG59.25sS. CARLIH1 → Finish sprint