Comparison
Pit two athletes against each other, sector by sector, hundredth by hundredth.
VS
Warholm wins by 1.20s
Total time
46.52s47.72s
-1.20s
Average interval
3.97s4.06s
-0.09s
Std. deviation
0.280.29
-0.01
Fastest split
3.58s3.68s
-0.10s
Deceleration
7.6%7.3%
+0.30
K. WARHOLM
46.52sE. AGYEKUM
47.72s
46.52sE. AGYEKUM47.72s| Sectors | Splits | Cumulative | Strides | Lead leg | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | Diff. | A | B | Diff. | |||
| Start | 5.82 | 6.09 | -0.27 | 5.82 | 6.09 | -0.27 | 20/20 | L/L |
| H2 | 3.58 | 3.68 | -0.10 | 9.40 | 9.77 | -0.37 | 13/13 | L/L |
| H3 | 3.65 | 3.72 | -0.07 | 13.05 | 13.49 | -0.44 | 13/13 | L/L |
| H4 | 3.71 | 3.78 | -0.07 | 16.76 | 17.27 | -0.51 | 13/13 | L/L |
| H5 | 3.85 | 3.90 | -0.05 | 20.61 | 21.17 | -0.56 | 13/13 | L/L |
| H6 | 3.95 | 4.06 | -0.11 | 24.56 | 25.23 | -0.67 | 13/13 | L/L |
| H7 | 4.05 | 4.16 | -0.11 | 28.61 | 29.39 | -0.78 | 13/13 | L/L |
| H8 | 4.18 | 4.24 | -0.06 | 32.79 | 33.63 | -0.84 | 13/14 | L/R |
| H9 | 4.31 | 4.44 | -0.13 | 37.10 | 38.07 | -0.97 | 13/14 | L/L |
| H10 | 4.41 | 4.54 | -0.13 | 41.51 | 42.61 | -1.10 | 15/14 | L/R |
| Finish sprint | 5.01 | 5.11 | -0.10 | 46.52 | 47.72 | -1.20 | Σ 139/Σ 140 | —/— |
Duel replay
0.00s
- K. Warholm46.52sleading
- E. Agyekum47.72sleading
Starting positions and hurldes are aligned to better show the gaps between runners.
Stride pattern
Stride count and lead leg, hurdle by hurdle
Warholm (2026)Agyekum (2026)
The turning point
One leader, wire to wire
K. WARHOLM46.52sE. AGYEKUM47.72s
46.52sE. AGYEKUM47.72sK. WARHOLMH1 → Finish sprint
Head-to-head record
3Warholm
–0Agyekum
over 3 meetings