Comparison
Pit two athletes against each other, sector by sector, hundredth by hundredth.
VS
Warholm wins by 0.81s
Total time
46.69s47.50s
-0.81s
Average interval
3.97s4.05s
-0.08s
Std. deviation
0.290.34
-0.05
Fastest split
3.54s3.58s
-0.04s
Deceleration
8.2%8.2%
0.00
K. WARHOLM
46.69sE. NATHANIEL
47.50s
46.69sE. NATHANIEL47.50s| Sectors | Splits | Cumulative | Strides | Lead leg | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | Diff. | A | B | Diff. | |||
| Start | 5.80 | 6.02 | -0.22 | 5.80 | 6.02 | -0.22 | 20/20 | L/R |
| H2 | 3.54 | 3.58 | -0.04 | 9.34 | 9.60 | -0.26 | 13/13 | L/R |
| H3 | 3.71 | 3.68 | +0.03 | 13.05 | 13.28 | -0.23 | 13/13 | L/R |
| H4 | 3.75 | 3.81 | -0.06 | 16.80 | 17.09 | -0.29 | 13/13 | L/R |
| H5 | 3.81 | 3.87 | -0.06 | 20.61 | 20.96 | -0.35 | 13/13 | L/R |
| H6 | 3.89 | 3.99 | -0.10 | 24.50 | 24.95 | -0.45 | 13/13 | L/R |
| H7 | 4.07 | 4.19 | -0.12 | 28.57 | 29.14 | -0.57 | 13/13 | L/R |
| H8 | 4.13 | 4.19 | -0.06 | 32.70 | 33.33 | -0.63 | 13/13 | L/R |
| H9 | 4.29 | 4.47 | -0.18 | 36.99 | 37.80 | -0.81 | 13/14 | L/L |
| H10 | 4.50 | 4.64 | -0.14 | 41.49 | 42.44 | -0.95 | 15/14 | L/R |
| Finish sprint | 5.20 | 5.06 | +0.14 | 46.69 | 47.50 | -0.81 | Σ 139/Σ 139 | —/— |
Duel replay
0.00s
- K. Warholm46.69sleading
- E. Nathaniel47.50sleading
Starting positions and hurldes are aligned to better show the gaps between runners.
Stride pattern
Stride count and lead leg, hurdle by hurdle
Warholm (2026)Nathaniel (2026)
The turning point
One leader, wire to wire
K. WARHOLM46.69sE. NATHANIEL47.50s
46.69sE. NATHANIEL47.50sK. WARHOLMH1 → Finish sprint
Head-to-head record
3Warholm
–1Nathaniel
over 4 meetings