Comparison
Pit two athletes against each other, sector by sector, hundredth by hundredth.
VS
Nathaniel wins by 0.47s
Total time
47.58s47.11s
+0.47s
Average interval
4.02s4.03s
-0.01s
Std. deviation
0.440.30
+0.14
Fastest split
3.44s3.68s
-0.24s
Deceleration
14.4%7.0%
+7.40
K. WARHOLM
47.58sE. NATHANIEL
47.11s
47.58sE. NATHANIEL47.11s| Sectors | Splits | Cumulative | Strides | Lead leg | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | Diff. | A | B | Diff. | |||
| Start | 5.70 | 5.94 | -0.24 | 5.70 | 5.94 | -0.24 | 20/21 | L/R |
| H2 | 3.44 | 3.68 | -0.24 | 9.14 | 9.62 | -0.48 | 13/13 | L/R |
| H3 | 3.56 | 3.72 | -0.16 | 12.70 | 13.34 | -0.64 | 13/13 | L/R |
| H4 | 3.68 | 3.68 | 0.00 | 16.38 | 17.02 | -0.64 | 13/13 | L/R |
| H5 | 3.80 | 3.92 | -0.12 | 20.18 | 20.94 | -0.76 | 13/13 | L/R |
| H6 | 3.92 | 4.00 | -0.08 | 24.10 | 24.94 | -0.84 | 13/13 | L/R |
| H7 | 4.08 | 4.08 | 0.00 | 28.18 | 29.02 | -0.84 | 13/13 | L/R |
| H8 | 4.28 | 4.20 | +0.08 | 32.46 | 33.22 | -0.76 | 13/13 | L/R |
| H9 | 4.56 | 4.44 | +0.12 | 37.02 | 37.66 | -0.64 | 15/14 | L/L |
| H10 | 4.84 | 4.52 | +0.32 | 41.86 | 42.18 | -0.32 | 15/14 | L/R |
| Finish sprint | 5.72 | 4.93 | +0.79 | 47.58 | 47.11 | +0.47 | Σ 141/Σ 140 | —/— |
Duel replay
0.00s
- K. Warholm47.58sleading
- E. Nathaniel47.11sleading
Starting positions and hurldes are aligned to better show the gaps between runners.
Stride pattern
Stride count and lead leg, hurdle by hurdle
Warholm (2025)Nathaniel (2025)
The turning point
1 lead change
K. WARHOLM47.58sE. NATHANIEL47.11s
47.58sE. NATHANIEL47.11sK. WARHOLMH1 → H10
E. NATHANIELFinish sprint
Head-to-head record
3Warholm
–1Nathaniel
over 4 meetings