Comparison
Pit two athletes against each other, sector by sector, hundredth by hundredth.
VS
Couckuyt wins by 4.17s
Total time
55.08s59.25s
-4.17s
Average interval
4.71s5.06s
-0.35s
Std. deviation
0.460.46
0.00
Fastest split
4.13s4.42s
-0.29s
Deceleration
15.0%13.8%
+1.20
P. COUCKUYT
55.08sR. DANNENBURG
59.25s
55.08sR. DANNENBURG59.25s| Sectors | Splits | Cumulative | Strides | Lead leg | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | Diff. | A | B | Diff. | |||
| Start | 6.27 | 6.87 | -0.60 | 6.27 | 6.87 | -0.60 | 23/23 | L/R |
| H2 | 4.13 | 4.42 | -0.29 | 10.40 | 11.29 | -0.89 | 15/16 | L/L |
| H3 | 4.22 | 4.58 | -0.36 | 14.62 | 15.87 | -1.25 | 15/16 | L/R |
| H4 | 4.25 | 4.62 | -0.37 | 18.87 | 20.49 | -1.62 | 15/16 | L/L |
| H5 | 4.39 | 4.74 | -0.35 | 23.26 | 25.23 | -1.97 | 15/16 | L/R |
| H6 | 4.62 | 5.04 | -0.42 | 27.88 | 30.27 | -2.39 | 15/16 | L/L |
| H7 | 5.03 | 5.40 | -0.37 | 32.91 | 35.67 | -2.76 | 17/17 | L/L |
| H8 | 5.20 | 5.62 | -0.42 | 38.11 | 41.29 | -3.18 | 17/18 | L/R |
| H9 | 5.20 | 5.54 | -0.34 | 43.31 | 46.83 | -3.52 | 17/17 | L/R |
| H10 | 5.36 | 5.58 | -0.22 | 48.67 | 52.41 | -3.74 | 17/17 | L/R |
| Finish sprint | 6.41 | 6.84 | -0.43 | 55.08 | 59.25 | -4.17 | Σ 166/Σ 172 | —/— |
Duel replay
0.00s
- P. Couckuyt55.08sleading
- R. Dannenburg59.25sleading
Starting positions and hurldes are aligned to better show the gaps between runners.
Stride pattern
Stride count and lead leg, hurdle by hurdle
Couckuyt (2025)Dannenburg (2026)
The turning point
One leader, wire to wire
P. COUCKUYT55.08sR. DANNENBURG59.25s
55.08sR. DANNENBURG59.25sP. COUCKUYTH1 → Finish sprint