Comparison
Pit two athletes against each other, sector by sector, hundredth by hundredth.
VS
Tumba wins by 2.15s
Total time
55.22s57.37s
-2.15s
Average interval
4.72s4.95s
-0.23s
Std. deviation
0.260.42
-0.16
Fastest split
4.30s4.30s
0.00s
Deceleration
6.2%11.5%
-5.30
M. TUMBA
55.22sC. VON PLAUEN57.37s
55.22sC. VON PLAUEN57.37s| Sectors | Splits | Cumulative | Strides | Lead leg | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | Diff. | A | B | Diff. | |||
| Start | 6.83 | 6.73 | +0.10 | 6.83 | 6.73 | +0.10 | 23/23 | R/R |
| H2 | 4.30 | 4.30 | 0.00 | 11.13 | 11.03 | +0.10 | 15/15 | R/R |
| H3 | 4.43 | 4.50 | -0.07 | 15.56 | 15.53 | +0.03 | 15/15 | R/R |
| H4 | 4.53 | 4.60 | -0.07 | 20.09 | 20.13 | -0.04 | 15/15 | R/R |
| H5 | 4.57 | 4.67 | -0.10 | 24.66 | 24.80 | -0.14 | 15/15 | R/R |
| H6 | 4.70 | 5.00 | -0.30 | 29.36 | 29.80 | -0.44 | 16/16 | L/L |
| H7 | 4.93 | 5.20 | -0.27 | 34.29 | 35.00 | -0.71 | 16/16 | R/R |
| H8 | 5.03 | 5.37 | -0.34 | 39.32 | 40.37 | -1.05 | 17/16 | R/L |
| H9 | 4.97 | 5.43 | -0.46 | 44.29 | 45.80 | -1.51 | 17/17 | R/L |
| H10 | 5.03 | 5.50 | -0.47 | 49.32 | 51.30 | -1.98 | 17/17 | R/L |
| Finish sprint | 5.90 | 6.07 | -0.17 | 55.22 | 57.37 | -2.15 | Σ 166/Σ 165 | —/— |
Duel replay
0.00s
- M. Tumba55.22sleading
- C. Von Plauen57.37sleading
Starting positions and hurldes are aligned to better show the gaps between runners.
Stride pattern
Stride count and lead leg, hurdle by hurdle
Tumba (2026)Von Plauen (2026)
The turning point
1 lead change
M. TUMBA55.22sC. VON PLAUEN57.37s
55.22sC. VON PLAUEN57.37sC. VON PLAUENH1 → H3
M. TUMBAH4 → Finish sprint
Head-to-head record
2Tumba
–0Von Plauen
over 2 meetings