Comparison
Pit two athletes against each other, sector by sector, hundredth by hundredth.
VS
Dean wins by 0.75s
Total time
48.37s47.62s
+0.75s
Average interval
4.13s4.08s
+0.05s
Std. deviation
0.390.35
+0.04
Fastest split
3.67s3.66s
+0.01s
Deceleration
11.1%9.4%
+1.70
E. NATHANIEL
48.37sC. DEAN
47.62s
48.37sC. DEAN47.62s| Sectors | Splits | Cumulative | Strides | Lead leg | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | Diff. | A | B | Diff. | |||
| Start | 5.92 | 5.92 | 0.00 | 5.92 | 5.92 | 0.00 | 20/21 | R/R |
| H2 | 3.74 | 3.70 | +0.04 | 9.66 | 9.62 | +0.04 | 13/13 | R/R |
| H3 | 3.73 | 3.66 | +0.07 | 13.39 | 13.28 | +0.11 | 13/13 | R/R |
| H4 | 3.67 | 3.72 | -0.05 | 17.06 | 17.00 | +0.06 | 13/13 | R/R |
| H5 | 3.90 | 3.86 | +0.04 | 20.96 | 20.86 | +0.10 | 13/13 | R/R |
| H6 | 4.10 | 4.06 | +0.04 | 25.06 | 24.92 | +0.14 | 13/15 | R/R |
| H7 | 4.23 | 4.20 | +0.03 | 29.29 | 29.12 | +0.17 | 13/15 | R/R |
| H8 | 4.30 | 4.30 | 0.00 | 33.59 | 33.42 | +0.17 | 13/14 | R/L |
| H9 | 4.70 | 4.54 | +0.16 | 38.29 | 37.96 | +0.33 | 14/16 | L/R |
| H10 | 4.77 | 4.66 | +0.11 | 43.06 | 42.62 | +0.44 | 14/15 | R/R |
| Finish sprint | 5.31 | 5.00 | +0.31 | 48.37 | 47.62 | +0.75 | Σ 139/Σ 148 | —/— |
Duel replay
0.00s
- E. Nathaniel48.37sleading
- C. Dean47.62sleading
Starting positions and hurldes are aligned to better show the gaps between runners.
Stride pattern
Stride count and lead leg, hurdle by hurdle
Nathaniel (2026)Dean (2026)
The turning point
One leader, wire to wire
E. NATHANIEL48.37sC. DEAN47.62s
48.37sC. DEAN47.62sC. DEANH2 → Finish sprint
Head-to-head record
1Nathaniel
–1Dean
over 2 meetings