Comparison
Pit two athletes against each other, sector by sector, hundredth by hundredth.
VS
Warholm wins by 0.81s
Total time
47.50s46.69s
+0.81s
Average interval
4.05s3.97s
+0.08s
Std. deviation
0.340.29
+0.05
Fastest split
3.58s3.54s
+0.04s
Deceleration
8.2%8.2%
0.00
E. NATHANIEL
47.50sK. WARHOLM
46.69s
47.50sK. WARHOLM46.69s| Sectors | Splits | Cumulative | Strides | Lead leg | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | Diff. | A | B | Diff. | |||
| Start | 6.02 | 5.80 | +0.22 | 6.02 | 5.80 | +0.22 | 20/20 | R/L |
| H2 | 3.58 | 3.54 | +0.04 | 9.60 | 9.34 | +0.26 | 13/13 | R/L |
| H3 | 3.68 | 3.71 | -0.03 | 13.28 | 13.05 | +0.23 | 13/13 | R/L |
| H4 | 3.81 | 3.75 | +0.06 | 17.09 | 16.80 | +0.29 | 13/13 | R/L |
| H5 | 3.87 | 3.81 | +0.06 | 20.96 | 20.61 | +0.35 | 13/13 | R/L |
| H6 | 3.99 | 3.89 | +0.10 | 24.95 | 24.50 | +0.45 | 13/13 | R/L |
| H7 | 4.19 | 4.07 | +0.12 | 29.14 | 28.57 | +0.57 | 13/13 | R/L |
| H8 | 4.19 | 4.13 | +0.06 | 33.33 | 32.70 | +0.63 | 13/13 | R/L |
| H9 | 4.47 | 4.29 | +0.18 | 37.80 | 36.99 | +0.81 | 14/13 | L/L |
| H10 | 4.64 | 4.50 | +0.14 | 42.44 | 41.49 | +0.95 | 14/15 | R/L |
| Finish sprint | 5.06 | 5.20 | -0.14 | 47.50 | 46.69 | +0.81 | Σ 139/Σ 139 | —/— |
Duel replay
0.00s
- E. Nathaniel47.50sleading
- K. Warholm46.69sleading
Starting positions and hurldes are aligned to better show the gaps between runners.
Stride pattern
Stride count and lead leg, hurdle by hurdle
Nathaniel (2026)Warholm (2026)
The turning point
One leader, wire to wire
E. NATHANIEL47.50sK. WARHOLM46.69s
47.50sK. WARHOLM46.69sK. WARHOLMH1 → Finish sprint
Head-to-head record
1Nathaniel
–3Warholm
over 4 meetings