Comparison
Pit two athletes against each other, sector by sector, hundredth by hundredth.
VS
Warholm wins by 1.69s
Total time
48.30s46.61s
+1.69s
Average interval
4.08s3.96s
+0.12s
Std. deviation
0.400.31
+0.09
Fastest split
3.60s3.58s
+0.02s
Deceleration
11.9%8.9%
+3.00
E. NATHANIEL
48.30sK. WARHOLM
46.61s
48.30sK. WARHOLM46.61s| Sectors | Splits | Cumulative | Strides | Lead leg | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | Diff. | A | B | Diff. | |||
| Start | 6.03 | 5.81 | +0.22 | 6.03 | 5.81 | +0.22 | 21/20 | R/L |
| H2 | 3.60 | 3.58 | +0.02 | 9.63 | 9.39 | +0.24 | 13/13 | R/L |
| H3 | 3.60 | 3.62 | -0.02 | 13.23 | 13.01 | +0.22 | 13/13 | R/L |
| H4 | 3.72 | 3.67 | +0.05 | 16.95 | 16.68 | +0.27 | 13/13 | R/L |
| H5 | 3.88 | 3.80 | +0.08 | 20.83 | 20.48 | +0.35 | 13/13 | R/L |
| H6 | 4.07 | 4.02 | +0.05 | 24.90 | 24.50 | +0.40 | 13/13 | R/L |
| H7 | 4.18 | 4.03 | +0.15 | 29.08 | 28.53 | +0.55 | 13/13 | R/L |
| H8 | 4.35 | 4.12 | +0.23 | 33.43 | 32.65 | +0.78 | 13/13 | R/L |
| H9 | 4.68 | 4.27 | +0.41 | 38.11 | 36.92 | +1.19 | 14/13 | L/L |
| H10 | 4.68 | 4.57 | +0.11 | 42.79 | 41.49 | +1.30 | 14/15 | R/L |
| Finish sprint | 5.51 | 5.12 | +0.39 | 48.30 | 46.61 | +1.69 | Σ 140/Σ 139 | —/— |
Duel replay
0.00s
- E. Nathaniel48.30sleading
- K. Warholm46.61sleading
Starting positions and hurldes are aligned to better show the gaps between runners.
Stride pattern
Stride count and lead leg, hurdle by hurdle
Nathaniel (2026)Warholm (2026)
The turning point
One leader, wire to wire
E. NATHANIEL48.30sK. WARHOLM46.61s
48.30sK. WARHOLM46.61sK. WARHOLMH1 → Finish sprint
Head-to-head record
1Nathaniel
–3Warholm
over 4 meetings