Comparison
Pit two athletes against each other, sector by sector, hundredth by hundredth.
VS
Nathaniel wins by 0.47s
Total time
47.11s47.58s
-0.47s
Average interval
4.03s4.02s
+0.01s
Std. deviation
0.300.44
-0.14
Fastest split
3.68s3.44s
+0.24s
Deceleration
7.0%14.4%
-7.40
E. NATHANIEL
47.11sK. WARHOLM
47.58s
47.11sK. WARHOLM47.58s| Sectors | Splits | Cumulative | Strides | Lead leg | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | Diff. | A | B | Diff. | |||
| Start | 5.94 | 5.70 | +0.24 | 5.94 | 5.70 | +0.24 | 21/20 | R/L |
| H2 | 3.68 | 3.44 | +0.24 | 9.62 | 9.14 | +0.48 | 13/13 | R/L |
| H3 | 3.72 | 3.56 | +0.16 | 13.34 | 12.70 | +0.64 | 13/13 | R/L |
| H4 | 3.68 | 3.68 | 0.00 | 17.02 | 16.38 | +0.64 | 13/13 | R/L |
| H5 | 3.92 | 3.80 | +0.12 | 20.94 | 20.18 | +0.76 | 13/13 | R/L |
| H6 | 4.00 | 3.92 | +0.08 | 24.94 | 24.10 | +0.84 | 13/13 | R/L |
| H7 | 4.08 | 4.08 | 0.00 | 29.02 | 28.18 | +0.84 | 13/13 | R/L |
| H8 | 4.20 | 4.28 | -0.08 | 33.22 | 32.46 | +0.76 | 13/13 | R/L |
| H9 | 4.44 | 4.56 | -0.12 | 37.66 | 37.02 | +0.64 | 14/15 | L/L |
| H10 | 4.52 | 4.84 | -0.32 | 42.18 | 41.86 | +0.32 | 14/15 | R/L |
| Finish sprint | 4.93 | 5.72 | -0.79 | 47.11 | 47.58 | -0.47 | Σ 140/Σ 141 | —/— |
Duel replay
0.00s
- E. Nathaniel47.11sleading
- K. Warholm47.58sleading
Starting positions and hurldes are aligned to better show the gaps between runners.
Stride pattern
Stride count and lead leg, hurdle by hurdle
Nathaniel (2025)Warholm (2025)
The turning point
1 lead change
E. NATHANIEL47.11sK. WARHOLM47.58s
47.11sK. WARHOLM47.58sK. WARHOLMH1 → H10
E. NATHANIELFinish sprint
Head-to-head record
1Nathaniel
–3Warholm
over 4 meetings